OLIVET NAZARENE
UNIVERSITY
DIVISION
OF SOCIAL SCIENCES
DEPARTMENT
OF HISTORY AND
POLITICAL
SCIENCE
POSTMODERN
POLITICAL THEORY
PSCI
460
PSCI 460 Spring
2001
Dr. Van
Heemst Office
Burke 002, x‑5127
REQUIRED BOOKS: (Note: These books are listed in the
order that we will read them and not in the typical bibliographical listing)
Tinder,
Glenn. Political Thinking: The
Perennial Questions. Sixth
edition. (New York: Harper Collins,
1995).
Nietzsche,
Friedrich. Beyond Good and Evil:
Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future.
Translated by Walter Kaufmann.
(New York: Vintage Books, 1966).
Rorty,
Richard. Contingency, Irony, and
Solidarity. (England: Cambridge
University Press, 1989).
Voegelin,
Eric. Science, Politics, and
Gnosticism. (Washington, D.C.:
Regnery Gateway, 1966).
Walsh,
Brian and Richard Middleton. Truth
is Stranger Than it Used to Be.
(Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 1995).
Sire,
James. Chris Chrisman Goes to
College and Faces the Challenges of Relativism, Individualism, and Pluralism. (Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 1993).
Newbigin,
Lesslie. Proper Confidence: Faith,
Doubt, and Certainty in Christian Discipleship. (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995).
Newbigin,
Lesslie. The Gospel in a Pluralist
Society. (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans,
1989).
Garber,
Steven. The Fabric of Faithfulness:
Weaving Together Belief and Behavior During the University Years. (Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 1996).
RECOMMENDED BOOKS: (by category)
INTRODUCTION TO POSTMODERNISM
Foucault,
Michael. The Foucault Reader. (New York: Pantheon Books, 1985).
Kamuf,
Peggy (ed.). A Derrida Reader:
Between the Blinds. (New York:
Columbia Press, 1991).
Kearney,
Richard and Rainwater, Mara. The
Continental Philosophy Reader. (New
York: Routledge, 1996).
May,
Todd. Twentieth Century Continental
Philosophy: a Reader. (USA:
Prentice Hall, 1996).
POSTMODERN SELECTIONS
Gadamer,
Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. (New York: Continuum, 1993).
Habermas,
Jurgen. Legitimation Crisis. (Boston: Beacon Publishers, 1975).
Heidegger,
Martin. The Question Concerning
Technology. (New York: Harper
Collins, 1982).
Kierkegaard,
Soren. Fear and Trembling. (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1994).
Weiss, T.G. Beyond Epistemology: New Studies in the Philosophy of Hegel. (Norwell: Kluwer Academic Press, 1974).
POSTMODERN FEMINISTS
Irigaray,
Luce. This Sex Which is Not One. (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1985).
RESPONSES TO POSTMODERNISM
Arendt,
Hannah. The Human Condition. (Magnolia: Peter Smith Press, 1990).
Caesar,
James. Reconstructing America: The
Symbol of America in Modern Thought.
(New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997).
Milbank,
John. Theology and Social Theory:
Beyond Secular Reason. (Malden:
Basil Blackwell, 1991).
Pangle, Thomas. The Ennobling of Democracy: the Challenge of the Postmodern Age. (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991).
Voegelin,
Eric. The New Science of Politics. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press,
1987).
POSTMODERNISM IS PASSE
Ferry,
Luc. Why We are not Nietzschiennes. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press,
1997).
CRITIQUES OF CONTEMPORARY PHILOSOPHY AND SOCIETY
Bellah,
Robert. et. al. Habits of the Heart:
Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Second edition.
(California: University of California Press, 1996).
Fowler,
Robert Booth. The Dance With
Community: The Contemporary
Debate
in American Political Thought. (Kansas: University of
Sire,
James. The Universe Next Door. (Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 1997,
3rd edition).
DYSUTOPIAS
Huxley,
Aldous. Brave New World. (New York: Harper and Row,1946).
Zamyatin,
Yevgeny. We. (New York: Avon Books, 1972).
PURPOSE
This course is a continuation of the
History of Political Philosophy. In
that course you were challenged to grapple with the insights of the major
philosophers of the Western tradition and to question everything you have
believed up to this point. This course,
Postmodern Political Theory, continues with those two themes by focusing on the
most significant thinkers of the past century.
The central questions in this course are the following: What do you believe and what difference does
that make in your life? In this course
you will be challenged to address these basic questions honestly. It has become excessively difficult to think
clearly during the postmodern age and this course is designed to assist the student
in a) understanding the contours of the postmodern society, and b) reflecting
on a Christian response to postmodernism.
Above all else, the student will be asked to reflect personally and
deeply about what they believe, whether it's true, and how that concretely
impacts the student's life.
To accomplish these goals, the books,
lectures, and discussions are designed to assist students in understanding the
major competing postmodernists and the responses to them. At the heart of postmodernism is a sense
that "we" have moved beyond the perennial questions. Grappling and wrestling with the perennial
questions supposedly has not "gotten" us anywhere. So, let's Agive up on it,@ as Richard
Rorty is fond of saying. To get a sense
of what is being called on to "give up," we shall first assess the
perennial questions, as described by Glenn Tinder in his Political Thinking.
While it=s difficult to pinpoint an exact start to
postmodernism, there is a general consensus that one of the fathers of
postmodernism was Friedrich Nietzsche.
Thus, we will allow the postmodernists to speak for themselves. We shall read his classic piece, Beyond
Good and Evil, in which he points out that Western civilization needs to go
beyond "slave morality" and usher in a new age of subjectivism in
which the truly superior will not be limited by "slave
morality." Christianity, he
argues, has been the death of Western civilization and represents little more
than the Areligion of the
masses.@
Following Nietzsche is the most
significant living American postmodernist, my old professor from the University
of Virginia, Richard Rorty. So, the
most noted American postmodernist, Richard Rorty, will be our next focal point. We shall work through his ideas in his
seminal Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. In this book he provides an excellent overview of postmodern
political theory. We shall examine how
he has updated and applied postmodern thought to America at the birth of the
new millennium.
What do you make of Nietzsche and
Rorty? For guidance, we should turn to
the Master! Perhaps the most profound insight into Nietzsche and other gnostics
was made by the one and only, Eric Voegelin.
To that end we shall examine his cogent but incredibly powerful
arguments in his Science, Politics, and Gnosticism. There is no finer philosophical analysis of
postmodernism.
What might be a sophisticated, sensitive
and intellectual Christian response to postmodernism? Many so-called Christian responses to postmodernism are not worth
the paper they=re written
on. The book you will read is an
exception. Walsh and Middleton, in
their Truth is Stranger Than is Used to Be, provide an outstanding
overview of postmodernism and a Christian response to it. This book will provide you with the philosophical
overview for the entire course. Master
this book!!!
How is all of this translated into the
contemporary academic setting? To get a
handle on this question, you will read James Sire's powerful Chris Chrisman
Goes to College. In this piece, Sire
provides an amazing insight into the present nature of argumentation in
American colleges and universities.
While some of the book might be a bit Acheezy,@ his insights into the major arguments of
postmodernism are nonetheless helpful.
Now, for the deep thinking. From a Christian perspective, how might you
begin to think through all of the issues of postmodernism? To get a handle on this, we shall read two
outstanding books by Lesslie Newbigin: Proper Confidence and his
classic, The Gospel in a Pluralist Society. Newbigin is a very difficult writer to understand because he is
such a gifted philosopher.
Nevertheless, it is well worth the effort because his insights are well,
uncanny. You will certainly walk away
with an amazing insight into Truth after having worked through Newbigin. The first book we shall read is basically an
elaborate thesis statement. Then
Newbigin Agets into it
deeply@ in The
Gospel in a Pluralist Society.
Finally, we shall ask the question, how
does all of this apply to each of us?
What sense can we make of all of this during our university years? To get a handle on this, we shall work
through the much revered Fabric of Faithfulness by Steve Garber. This book is helpful in gaining a sense of
how to apply everything that we have learned through the semester to our
immediate lives.
At the end of the course, the student
will be able to articulate what is meant by postmodern political theory, a
postmodern society, assess how the U.S. got into this situation, and offer
tentative solutions to the current, so‑called "crisis." The student will be able to identify the
major arguments of postmodernism, analyze and assess each perspective, compare
and contrast the perspectives, and critique each from a Christian perspective. At the end of the course, the student should
be well acquainted with the
major philosophical arguments
regarding contemporary society,
possess a working knowledge of the major political theorists of our
current age, and be able to respond to each from a Christian perspective.
FINAL
GRADE EVALUATION
The
student's final grade will be based upon the following criteria, in which I use the traditional 90, 80,
70, 60 grade scale:
1
Major Paper (1x10%) 10%
Book
Outlines (9x5%) 45%
3
Exams (3x15%) 45%
100%
Your one major
paper will be due on January 30. In
that paper you will be asked to read a series of articles, write a unified
paper, and respond to these specific questions: 1) Is the intellectual life
something a Christian should pursue? (Read ACuriosity Killed the Cat,@ and AMinding the
Evangelical Mind@), 2) what is
the purpose of scholarship? (Read AEducating for Shalom,@ and AWhat are we
doing here?@), 3) how would
you describe what=s happening in our cultural currently in terms
of Gen. X. and Atolerance?@ (Read AGen. X.
Apologetics,@ and AAre you
Tolerant?@), 4) what has
happened to our culture from a Christian perspective? (Read, AWho Turned out
the Lights?@), 5) why might
a Christian be wary of postmodernism? (Read APostmodernism and a Christian Response@), 6) what
might be an alternative Christian perspective to postmodernism? (Read AScripture, Law
and Fruit@). This paper should be 10-12 pages in
length. This paper will comprise 10% of
your final grade.
You will also
write extensive outlines of each of the nine books that we read. Your task will be to outline each chapter in
roughly one page. So, if there are 10
chapters in said book, you will turn in a 10 page outline paper for that
book. The focus here is to read the
authors of each book as carefully as possible.
Each of these will comprise 5%, totaling 45% of your final grade. Each of the outlines will be due on the
first day we begin discussing the philosopher.
Hence, you should have each book read before we begin discussing it.
Finally, you
will take three exams in this course.
Since you have already mastered the content of what the philosophers are
saying in your outlined summaries, in these three exams I will ask you to
analyze, assess and critique what we have been reading. The essay question will be a surprise to you
when you walk into class on that particular day. Nevertheless, fear not.
The questions will be based upon the reading, lectures and discussions
we have had up to that point. While
none of these are the essay questions you will get, here are some examples of
what you might want to be looking for in the books as you begin to think
critically in preparation for the examinations:
Walsh and Middleton: Truth is Stranger
Than it Used to Be
How does a Christian perspective respond
to postmodernism? In your paper you
might want to focus on the two important themes of the Middleton and Walsh
book: 1) what is postmodern, what are the big questions it deals with, what are
concrete examples of it from the book and that you've notice in culture, from
your friends, and in yourself?, 2) how
does a Christian perspective respond to these concrete problems? Above
all else, making
sure that you
answer the question, what does
this mean to me and for me as I plan to leave Olivet in the near future?
Lesslie Newbigin: Proper Confidence
What is Lesslie Newbigin's path out of
the postmodern quagmire, and do you agree?
Newbigin argues that the two major camps of contemporary Christianity
fail to deal adequately with postmodernism: liberal theology and conservative
fundamentalism. Do you agree with his
critique of these two camps? What does
Newbigin mean by a third way, the way of Proper Confidence? Can you flesh out what he means by a "confident
explorer?" Would you describe
yourself as a "confident explorer?"
Lesslie Newbigin: The Gospel in a Pluralist Society
What is the role of the Gospel in a
pluralist society? Hint: you might want
to focus on the three big themes of the book: 1) what is the fact/value
dichotomy, why is it so important, what's wrong with it?, 2) what is meant by
the Bible as universal history?, why is it so vitally important?, 3) what is
meant by the myth of the secular society, why is this so important? how does this related to the first important
theme? what insights does this provide
for you into contemporary politics, such as the idea that religion has no place
in politics because of separation of church and state?
Steve Garber: The Fabric of Faithfulness
You could answer these two questions
which Steve Garber has raised: What do you believe and what difference does
that make in your life? As you reflect
on the first question, be sure to address the necessary sub-question, is it
true? As you reflect on the first
question, also address whether you believe it to be true as a private issue
and/or as public truth, keeping in mind Newbigin's reference to "universal
intent" from Polanyi. Describe
what you believe and what difference that makes in the actual concrete living
of your life: career or calling?, interpersonal relationships, goal of your
life, involvement in society, etc. Has
this whole course been an academic exercise or has it challenged you to think
meaningfully about how you think you will live your life now and in your
post-Olivet years?
COURSE OUTLINE
January
9 Introduction
January
11 Lecture: The Essence of
Postmodernism
January
16 " "
January
18 Readings: Articles handed out in
class and Tinder: The Perennial Questions
Paper Due: Outlined Paper of Tinder
January
23 " " (Note: I will be gone-- Federal Seminar!)
January
25 " " "
"
January
30 Nietzsche: Beyond Good and
Evil
Papers Due: 1) Major paper over the
articles
2) Outlined paper of Nietzsche
February
1 " "
February
6 " "
February
8 Rorty: Contingency, Irony, and
Solidarity
Paper Due: 1) Outlined paper of Rorty
February 13 A @
February 15 A @
February
20 Voegelin: Science, Politics, and
Gnosticism
Paper Due: 1) Outlined paper of Voegelin
February
22 " "
February 27 Exam #1
March
1 Walsh and Middleton: Truth
is Stranger Than it Used to Be
Paper Due: 1) Outlined paper of Walsh and
Middleton
March
6 " "
March
8 " "
March 13 No Class!! Spring Break!!
March
15 No Class!! Spring Break!!
March
20 Sire: Chris Chrisman Goes to
College
Paper Due: 1) Outlined paper of Sire
March
22 A @
March 27 Exam #2
March 29 Newbigin: Proper Confidence
Paper Due: 1) Outlined paper of Newbigin
April
3 " "
April
5 Newbigin: The Gospel in a Pluralist
Society
Paper Due: 1) Outlined paper of Newbigin
April
10 " "
April
12 " "
April
17 A @
April 19 Garber: The Fabric of
Faithfulness
Paper Due: 1) Outlined paper of Garber
April
24 " "
April
26 Exam #3